Purpose |
|
In this section of the Hooper Museum I will examine several papers which defend Cope’s rule and several which dismiss it. Those in support of Cope’s claim are a study of size increase and its effects on longevity in Jurassic bivalves and ammonites (Hallam, 1975) and a more recent study which looked at trends in characteristic traits for vertebrates, invertebrates and plants (Kingsolver and Pfennig, 2004, Hone and Benton, 2005). Several papers have also been written in |
|
opposition to Cope’s Rule which include a study performed on planktonic Foraminifera which takes into account size-related biases (Arnold et al., 1995) as well as a study on Cretaceous molluscs which compares net body size increase to increases in size range among species and decreases in net body size (Jablonski, 1997). | |